2014년 6월 1일 일요일

"Prue" vs. "My Heart is Broken"

"Prue" vs. "My Heart is Broken"
Yoonhoo Chang
Women, who went through the times of dire oppression in the fields of literature, began to let their voice out by 18th century. Beginning from finding their place among male authors, female authors slowly moved on to talk about the social issue regarding the status of woman. They created fiction out of reality, and hoped to find increased concerns about sexism and sexual policies. Sure, they were faced with immense criticisms that last until now, but the word "feminism" is labeled in front of the important literary movement which made meaningful steps. "Prue" and "My Heart is Broken" are both short stories partly or fully related to feminist movement, so have many similarities, along with many differences. As female writers, Alice Munro and Mavis Gallant wrote stories that are depicting woman, but doing so in different ways.
Protagonist of "Prue" (who is Prue), is obviously a stronger woman than protagonist of "My Heart is Broken", Jeannie. They have a similarities in that both women regard sex not as an important or grave thing, and live not like traditional wives. Prue divorced and escaped the marriage she considered horrible, and talks freely with people around her, regardless of gender. She, for sure, doesn't look like a woman who is completely soaked into house works. Jeannie, like Prue, questions the duty of wife. She does not understand what the older woman emphasizes the duty of proper wife should be. She is light-hearted about men and sex, as she is about house works. However, there are drastic differences between them, and first of them is the "job". Prue works as a owner of plant shop and is completely independent from men, financially. She regards the "richness" of Gordon-her lover-as pleasing, but she takes the wealth light-heartedly and asks for nothing. Jeannie, who is young and is married to a older man, has no financial independence whatsoever, compared to Prue. She moves when her husband decides to move, and has no job. All she does is the house work, which she doesn't take seriously. Moreover, even though their views about sex is quite the same, Prue never seemed to have experience of "rape" whereas Jeannie experienced two rapes.
Two women views the world around them differently. Prue is liked by nearly everyone she knows. Her environment is full of people who are willing to listen to her stories, and ready to smile at her light-heartedness. Gordon, her "lover", cooks for her and invites her to dinner. Besides what is happening in her mind, she seems to have no grave conflicts with the surrounding world. She seems to be stable, and is able to make herself contented by surrounding figures. Even her children are nice and caring for her, when most of the children in this story neglect their parents. On the other hand, Jeannie experiences quite a few hardships and conflicts. She was happy with the fact that everyone liked her, but after the rape, she was broken-hearted because she discovered who showed hatred to her. Unmannered, impolite people exists, or started to exist, in her world and that's the main theme of the story. And Jeannie is uncomfortable with the paymaster's wife, whom she's talking to throughout the story. Paymaster's wife scolds her, and blames her for something she should have done, but hasn't. Jeannie's naive view about the world changes by her experience, and she instead views her environment as unsafe and heart-breaking.
As a reader, I was first shocked at how these women viewed sex. Normally, in the stories I read so far, women were close-minded and knew their "place". But Prue and Jeannie viewed sex with no seriousness. Probably this shockingly new viewpoint is because these two women are on the frontiers of new-born countries, but surely the new wave of feminist writers' writing styles should have played the role. It's agreeable that two women have their own strength, but honestly Prue was a more memorable character. She is a strong women who regarded the irrational "love" statement of Gordon forgettable. Jeannie, whom I personally disliked, was fragile and a "womanly" figure who represented the normal woman of that era-helpless, girly, and easily-hurt.

One writer said feminism is the radical notion that women are human beings. Even though their depiction of women were different, these two stories claimed this statement to be meaningful. Prue showed the independent woman who had characteristics that even modern woman would view as "abnormal". Jeannie showed the tears of fragility, and sexual, financial dominance of men but emphasized the social problem. 

댓글 1개:

  1. Pretty good. Nice mode of comparison with solid insights. Gramatically you could polish it up a bit in a few places, but generally a good direction and pattern of comparison.

    When you say both women view sex similarly, I would argue strongly that this is not the case. Prue seems to be in touch with what sex is and isn't. She enjoys it, but doesn't focus on it or indulge in it for any reason beyond "wholesome" activity. She's an older woman who is beyond the stage of experimentation that Jeannie is in. For Jeannie, sex is her bargaining chip when it comes to her ego. Men don't want her for her mind, and the only thing she thinks she has to offer is her body. I don't think she enjoys sex, and after being raped a couple of times it is safe to say she has a fragile ego that doesn't understand "love" or sex. She's young and disconnected from the world. Prue is not disconnected so much as she's passive. Prue is wise to some extent. Jeannie is not wise at all.

    Good work!

    답글삭제